Is a power of attorney an abdication, or temporary delegation of your authority to act?

“I recently had to sign a power of attorney authorising my attorney to act on my behalf in my property transfer. It just got me wondering about what exactly a power of attorney means and for how long it remains valid. Can you enlighten me?”

A power of attorney (POA) is a document wherein one person (the Principal) provides authorisation to another (the Agent) to act on his behalf. Usually, this power of attorney is provided with a specific purpose in mind. As you mentioned, a POA is quite common when it comes to property transactions. Here a person, usually an attorney, is provided with the authority to sign and submit the necessary documents on behalf of the Principal when preparing and submitting the relevant documents to the Deeds Office. In this way, the process of registration can be speeded up as the attorney (as Agent) can sign on the Principal’s behalf and so avoid having to get the signature of the Principal each time something needs to be signed.

This is often the general use of a POA – to speed up certain administrative processes by allowing another party to take care of and sign documents on your behalf. Another type of POA can be where a POA is given to an Agent as a form of security. Typically, one may encounter such a POA where a financial institution demands a POA as security for debt. For example, the Principal must provide the bank (Agent) a POA allowing the bank to sell moveable or immovable property on behalf of the Principal to cover the Principal’s debt obligations, should the Principal for example default on payment. By giving such a POA, the bank in effect obtains the Principal’s consent in advance to sell the property and can continue with such actions should the Principal default. Hence the use in this situation as security. 

However, to answer your question of how long a POA remains valid, we should look at a very recent judgment by our Supreme Court of Appeal, where the court had to deal with the question of whether a POA given as security could be revoked and if so when.

In assessing the position, the court reiterated the general position that a Principal can at any time terminate (revoke) a POA, unless:

1. It was granted for the purpose of protecting or securing some interest of the Agent
2. It forms one of the terms of a contract between the parties
3. It was given to secure performance of a promise made by the Principal to the Agent

Accordingly, our courts found that despite the general position that you can terminate a POA at any time, a Principal may not terminate or revoke a POA while the debt sought to be secured remains outstanding. 

January 6, 2021
Out with maternity leave, in with parental leave

Out with maternity leave, in with parental leave

A landmark judgment delivered on 3 October 2025 by the Constitutional Court of South Africa has reshaped the legal landscape governing employment and family rights. In Van Wyk and Others v Minister of Employment and Labour; Commission for Gender Equality and Another v Minister of Employment and Labour and Others (CCT 308/23) [2025] ZACC 20, the Court declared several provisions of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act 75 of 1997 (“BCEA”) and the Unemployment Insurance Act 63 of 2001 (“UIF Act”) invalid and inconsistent with the Constitution in that they unfairly discriminate between different classes of parents.

AI regulation on the horizon

AI regulation on the horizon

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming industries, and everyday life. We now live in an era where information cannot be trusted at face value, and content creation blurs the lines between reality and fiction. With such a dangerous capability literally at anyone’s fingertips, it is normal to wonder whether AI is being regulated in South Africa. In this article, we look at the current position regarding AI in South Africa.

The tax distinction between local and foreign dividends

The tax distinction between local and foreign dividends

Dividends from South African resident companies fall under the dividends tax regime and are subject to a 20% withholding tax in terms of section 64E of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 (“Act”), known as dividends tax, rather than normal income tax. In contrast, foreign dividends are included in a taxpayer’s gross income unless relief is available under section 10B of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962, which provides a full or partial participation exemption depending on certain circumstances. In this article, we unpack the important distinction in the tax treatment of local vs foreign dividends in South Africa.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest