Must you pay the estate agent if there is no agreement?

When buying or selling a property, estate agents play a crucial role in facilitating the process. But what happens when there is no explicit agreement regarding the estate agent's commission? Is it still payable?

In most jurisdictions, the general rule is that an estate agent’s commission is only payable if there is a valid agreement in place. This agreement can be in the form of a written contract or verbal understanding. Without an agreement however, the agent’s commission may not be enforceable.

That said, there are exceptions and considerations that may still render agent’s commission payable. If an agent can prove that their actions and the client’s behavior implied an agreement, commission may still be payable. In some instances, industry norms and customs may establish a standard commission rate, making it enforceable even without an explicit agreement had the client received services from the agent.

In the recent case of Golden Rewards 120 CC t/a Remax Marine v M3 Holdings (Pty) Ltd (D42/2019) [2024] ZAKZDHC 22 the issue of whether commission payable in the absence of an express agreement was in front of the court.

Having considered the matter the court found that having reviewed the facts, there was found to be an 
implied consensus on what was due to the plaintiff in lieu of the services rendered. This was further corroborated by the fact that there had been attempts by the parties to agree on some form of remuneration and as there was no evidence presented to rebut the presumption of commission being payable, the court found it permissible to allow a reasonable remuneration.

As to what would be seen as reasonable remuneration, the court confirmed the view that as a general rule that where nothing is said about the remuneration an estate agent is to receive, there is nonetheless a tacit promise to pay commission at the usual rate or customary rate of commission unless there is specific evidence to the contrary. In the Remax Marine case the court accordingly found that the estate agent was entitled to commission despite the absence of an express agreement regarding commission or the amount of commission. 

This case however highlights the importance for both client and estate agent to avoid disputes and upfront and in writing agree to the scope of the estate agent’s mandate and remuneration structure before services are provided.

Disclaimer: This article is the personal opinion/view of the author(s) and is not necessarily that of the firm. The content is provided for information only and should not be seen as an exact or complete exposition of the law. Accordingly, no reliance should be placed on the content for any reason whatsoever and no action should be taken on the basis thereof unless its application and accuracy has been confirmed by a legal advisor. The firm and author(s) cannot be held liable for any prejudice or damage resulting from action taken on the basis of this content without further written confirmation by the author(s). 

July 24, 2024
Out with maternity leave, in with parental leave

Out with maternity leave, in with parental leave

A landmark judgment delivered on 3 October 2025 by the Constitutional Court of South Africa has reshaped the legal landscape governing employment and family rights. In Van Wyk and Others v Minister of Employment and Labour; Commission for Gender Equality and Another v Minister of Employment and Labour and Others (CCT 308/23) [2025] ZACC 20, the Court declared several provisions of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act 75 of 1997 (“BCEA”) and the Unemployment Insurance Act 63 of 2001 (“UIF Act”) invalid and inconsistent with the Constitution in that they unfairly discriminate between different classes of parents.

AI regulation on the horizon

AI regulation on the horizon

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming industries, and everyday life. We now live in an era where information cannot be trusted at face value, and content creation blurs the lines between reality and fiction. With such a dangerous capability literally at anyone’s fingertips, it is normal to wonder whether AI is being regulated in South Africa. In this article, we look at the current position regarding AI in South Africa.

The tax distinction between local and foreign dividends

The tax distinction between local and foreign dividends

Dividends from South African resident companies fall under the dividends tax regime and are subject to a 20% withholding tax in terms of section 64E of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 (“Act”), known as dividends tax, rather than normal income tax. In contrast, foreign dividends are included in a taxpayer’s gross income unless relief is available under section 10B of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962, which provides a full or partial participation exemption depending on certain circumstances. In this article, we unpack the important distinction in the tax treatment of local vs foreign dividends in South Africa.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest