Tax incentives for employing youth in your business

“I have a young business that is developing well. But I need to appoint more staff. I’ve heard that there are tax incentives for employing youth. How do these work?”

A useful tax incentive for employing youth is ETI or Employee Tax Incentive. ETI allows you to benefit up to R12,000 per year for every qualifying youth you employ. ETI was introduced to help make it more affordable for businesses to appoint new staff and assist young job seekers to find employment. 

Through ETI, SARS subsidizes the appointment of youth by allowing a business to decrease their Pay-As-You-Earn (PAYE) for every qualifying youth that is hired. Businesses can decrease PAYE for up to 24 months from date of appointment. There is also no restriction on the amount of employees that you claim ETI for.

Employees who qualify for ETI must meet the following requirements:

Possess a South African ID
Be between 18 – 29 years of age
May not be domestic workers
May not be related or connected to the employer
Must earn at least a minimum wage
May not earn more than R6000 per month.
Must be a new appointment with the employer.

The incentive is calculated as follows:

 

Department of National Treasury & SARS

 

From this table it can be seen, that a business can claim up to R12,000 for the first year for every new qualifying youth that is appointed. 

Additionally, it can also be mentioned that SARS affords employers who invest in the training and development of their employees with additional tax incentives. Section 12(h) of the Income Tax Act provides for a deduction of R80,000 net profit after tax for a learner without a disability.

So, if you were to appoint a qualifying youth and immediately invest in that youth by placing him/her on a learnership you could receive a tax incentive of R92,000 for the first year of employment. You would simultaneously provide the youth with much needed access to the job market, training and workplace experience and invest in your own business by growing a young and skilled worker to add value to your business.

SARS affords multiple incentives for businesses that wish to invest in their human capital through the appointment of youth and their development through training initiatives. 

It would however be wise to consult with skills specialists to assist you to structure your employment and training initiatives correctly in order to take maximum advantage of the incentives available for businesses.

May 13, 2019
Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Dress codes are a familiar part of many workplaces, yet employers often fail to calibrate how far they are allowed to go in regulating employee personal appearance. While employers may enforce standards of neatness, safety and professionalism, these rules cannot override constitutional rights, nor can they operate in a discriminatory manner. A recent reminder of this emerged from the Supreme Court of Appeal, where the court had to consider the fairness of dismissing correctional officers for refusing to cut their dreadlocks, contrary to the employer’s dress code.

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

The Competition Commission of South Africa (“Competition Commission”) identified a need to guide merger parties and stakeholders on claiming confidentiality over information. In September 2025, the Competition Commission issued Guidelines on the Commission’s handling of confidential information (“Guidelines”), which, however, are not binding on the Competition Commission, the Competition Tribunal or the Competition Appeal Court, but must be taken into account by these authorities when interpreting and applying the Competition Act 89 of 1998 (“Competition Act”).

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

In a recent Western Cape court case where the court ordered the termination of joint ownership of properties, an interesting question arose as to whether the termination of joint ownership did not amount to an eviction contrary to the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act, 19 of 1998 (PIE Act)? We look at the requirements for the termination of joint ownership by our courts and whether this can infringe on the PIE Act.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest