The evolution of Estate Planning: Integrated solutions for modern wealth?

Estate planning has evolved. Today, it is no longer a single-faceted exercise handled by one professional in isolation. Effective estate planning requires a team, a group of experts collaborating across tax, legal, corporate, and compliance disciplines, whether it is offshore or onshore, to protect and grow wealth.

Estate planning does not operate in a vacuum. It is shaped by tax policy, political pressures, and economic realities. Recent developments in South Africa illustrate how quickly the landscape can change. For example, although the government rejected new wealth-specific taxes, the 2025 budget did not adjust personal income tax brackets for inflation. This “bracket creep” increases tax burdens even when real income remains unchanged. It is clear that the wealthy are being targeted. For clients who can restructure, corporate structures and trusts become central to preserving wealth, ensuring continuity, and protecting legacies. 

However, structures alone are not enough. Regulatory and compliance obligations have increased dramatically. The 2023 anti-money laundering (“AML”) reforms, following South Africa’s Financial Action Task Force (“FATF”) grey-listing, require trusts and companies to declare beneficial ownership to regulatory authorities. SARS is leveraging off the new AML reforms and has adopted a zero-tolerance approach to non-compliance, using AI-assisted assessments to identify underreported revenue.  

This increased scrutiny makes estate planning a living process, not a once-off exercise. Planners must design structures that are compliant, flexible, and adaptable to changes in legislation and enforcement. Modern estate planning demands expertise in multiple disciplines. Tax professionals optimise liabilities, legal experts ensure compliance and protect the integrity of structures, and fiduciary specialists manage structures and compliance obligations. Strategic foresight is also essential to anticipate regulatory, economic, and political changes that could affect estates and corporate arrangements. 

At PH Fiduciary, our integrated approach ensures that each client’s circumstances, family dynamics, asset mix, and long-term objectives, are fully considered. Properly structured trusts and corporate arrangements can provide continuity, tax efficiency, and security across generations. With the right professionals on your side, planning can be both strategic and practical.  

 
Disclaimer: This article is the personal opinion/view of the author(s) and does not necessarily present the views of the firm. The content is provided for information only and should not be seen as an exact or complete exposition of the law. Accordingly, no reliance should be placed on the content for any reason whatsoever, and no action should be taken on the basis thereof unless its application and accuracy have been confirmed by a legal advisor. The firm and author(s) cannot be held liable for any prejudice or damage resulting from action taken based on this content without further written confirmation by the author(s). 

September 4, 2025
Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Dress codes are a familiar part of many workplaces, yet employers often fail to calibrate how far they are allowed to go in regulating employee personal appearance. While employers may enforce standards of neatness, safety and professionalism, these rules cannot override constitutional rights, nor can they operate in a discriminatory manner. A recent reminder of this emerged from the Supreme Court of Appeal, where the court had to consider the fairness of dismissing correctional officers for refusing to cut their dreadlocks, contrary to the employer’s dress code.

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

The Competition Commission of South Africa (“Competition Commission”) identified a need to guide merger parties and stakeholders on claiming confidentiality over information. In September 2025, the Competition Commission issued Guidelines on the Commission’s handling of confidential information (“Guidelines”), which, however, are not binding on the Competition Commission, the Competition Tribunal or the Competition Appeal Court, but must be taken into account by these authorities when interpreting and applying the Competition Act 89 of 1998 (“Competition Act”).

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

In a recent Western Cape court case where the court ordered the termination of joint ownership of properties, an interesting question arose as to whether the termination of joint ownership did not amount to an eviction contrary to the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act, 19 of 1998 (PIE Act)? We look at the requirements for the termination of joint ownership by our courts and whether this can infringe on the PIE Act.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest