Is a copy of a will valid?

“Both my parents recently passed away in a car accident. My father shortly before his death mentioned to me that they recently had a new joint will drawn up. I’ve searched everywhere for the will and can only locate a copy of the signed will. Even their attorney does not have the original will. Can this copy be accepted as the valid will of my parents?”

In terms of our law of succession, the Master of the High Court can only register and accept wills that comply with all the formalities in terms of the Wills Act. In a case where an original will is lost or destroyed and only a copy of the original will is available, such a copy can be accepted by the Master, but an application will have to be made to court for an order declaring the copy of the original will valid for purposes of administering a deceased estate.

An executor nominated in terms of the will or any beneficiary entitled to inherit in accordance with the will can approach the court for an order directing the Master of the High Court to accept the will. Such an applicant will have to prove the following:

  1. That the will was executed in a due and valid manner.
  2. The circumstances in which the original will was lost or destroyed or that a diligent and sufficient search for the original will was made with no success.
  3. That the deceased had no intention of revoking the said will.
  4. That the copy of the original will contains the contents of the original executed will.

Only if the court is satisfied that the copy of the will is valid and represents the intentions of the testator, may the court order the Master to accept the copy of the will as valid and to be used for purposes of administering the estate.

Accordingly, our advice would be to approach your attorney and/or the indicated executor in the will to discuss the way forward and if an application should be brought to court for the copy to be accepted as a valid will by the Master.

October 12, 2021
Checkmate for Pawn Agreements: How the Recent SCA Judgment Protects Consumers from Pawnbroker Profits

Checkmate for Pawn Agreements: How the Recent SCA Judgment Protects Consumers from Pawnbroker Profits

In a landmark judgment delivered on 9 April 2025, where VDT Attorneys acted on behalf of the National Credit Regulator, the South African Supreme Court of Appeal (the “SCA”) brought clarity to the rights and obligations of consumers and pawnbrokers when dealing with pawned goods. In the case of The Loan Company (Pty) Ltd v National Credit Regulator and Another (1104/2023) [2025] ZASCA 40, the SCA confirmed a critical principle, i.e. if a pawned asset is sold for more than the outstanding loan and lawful charges, the surplus must be refunded to the consumer. Pawnbrokers cannot lawfully keep the full sale proceeds. This ruling marks a major victory for consumer protection, reinforcing South Africa’s commitment to fairness in credit transactions.

Heritage Day: Reflections from a New Breed law firm

Heritage Day: Reflections from a New Breed law firm

On 24 September, we pause to take time off to commemorate Heritage Day, a day enshrined in both our public calendar and the Constitution. A constitutional affirmation of who we are, where we come from, and where we are headed as a nation. As a new breed law firm, we reflect on how the practice of law is intertwined with the heritage of the very people it serves.

Treasury halts controversial tax proposal on preference shares

Treasury halts controversial tax proposal on preference shares

Due to the potential adverse investment impact and stakeholder concerns on the proposed amendment to the definition of “hybrid equity instrument” in the 2025 draft Taxation Laws Amendment Bill (“Bill”), the proposed amendment has been retracted. On 03 September, the National Treasury issued a media statement retracting the proposal to redefine hybrid equity instruments, which has been a relief to all stakeholders.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest