Is a copy of a will valid?

“Both my parents recently passed away in a car accident. My father shortly before his death mentioned to me that they recently had a new joint will drawn up. I’ve searched everywhere for the will and can only locate a copy of the signed will. Even their attorney does not have the original will. Can this copy be accepted as the valid will of my parents?”

In terms of our law of succession, the Master of the High Court can only register and accept wills that comply with all the formalities in terms of the Wills Act. In a case where an original will is lost or destroyed and only a copy of the original will is available, such a copy can be accepted by the Master, but an application will have to be made to court for an order declaring the copy of the original will valid for purposes of administering a deceased estate.

An executor nominated in terms of the will or any beneficiary entitled to inherit in accordance with the will can approach the court for an order directing the Master of the High Court to accept the will. Such an applicant will have to prove the following:

  1. That the will was executed in a due and valid manner.
  2. The circumstances in which the original will was lost or destroyed or that a diligent and sufficient search for the original will was made with no success.
  3. That the deceased had no intention of revoking the said will.
  4. That the copy of the original will contains the contents of the original executed will.

Only if the court is satisfied that the copy of the will is valid and represents the intentions of the testator, may the court order the Master to accept the copy of the will as valid and to be used for purposes of administering the estate.

Accordingly, our advice would be to approach your attorney and/or the indicated executor in the will to discuss the way forward and if an application should be brought to court for the copy to be accepted as a valid will by the Master.

October 12, 2021
Fee or tax? The court decides

Fee or tax? The court decides

With effect from 1 July 2025, the City of Cape Town introduced three new charges on residential rate bills. These charges were challenged by the South African Property Owners’ Association (SAPOA) and AfriForum, who argued that they were unlawful and improperly calculated. The dispute culminated in court applications seeking declaratory orders that the charges were invalid because they were inconsistent with the Constitution, national legislation, and the City’s own By-Laws.

Pay first… maybe not

Pay first… maybe not

For decades, the South African Revenue Service (“SARS”) has relied on the “pay now, argue later” rule as a cornerstone of tax administration. This principle permits SARS to collect disputed taxes before the underlying dispute has been resolved, often placing significant financial strain on taxpayers. While the rule serves an important fiscal purpose, it also raises critical questions regarding fairness, proportionality, and the limits of administrative discretion.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest