Trusts face penalties as SARS enforces compliance

The South African Revenue Services (“SARS”) has notified trusts of its intention to enforce penalties for the non-submission of trust tax returns. These penalties will apply regardless of whether the trust is active or dormant.

To improve compliance, a notice was published in the Government Gazette No. 54417 on 27 March 2026. This notice confirms that SARS will no longer tolerate non-compliance with the submission of trust tax returns (ITR12T) for the 2024/2025 assessment period. This action follows instances in which trusts failed to comply with the final demand to submit outstanding tax returns within the stipulated 21 business days of the date of issue of the final demand.

Fixed monthly penalties will be imposed on trusts that do not comply with SARS’s final demand within the required timeframe. These penalties range from R250 to R 16 000 per month, depending on the trust’s taxable income or assessed loss. Trustees may be held personally liable to settle the administrative penalties if their failure resulted in the trust receiving a penalty.

Trustees must ensure that all trusts, whether active or dormant, are registered for income tax with SARS. The trustees of the trust must ensure compliance with the IT3(t) submissions and the filing of the ITR12T tax returns during the tax season to avoid penalties. If a final demand has already been received from SARS, trustees should act immediately to rectify the non-compliance.

Disclaimer: This article is the personal opinion/view of the author(s) and does not necessarily present the views of the firm. The content is provided for information only and should not be seen as an exact or complete exposition of the law. Accordingly, no reliance should be placed on the content for any reason whatsoever, and no action should be taken on the basis thereof unless its application and accuracy have been confirmed by a legal advisor. The firm and author(s) cannot be held liable for any prejudice or damage resulting from action taken based on this content without further written confirmation by the author(s).

April 20, 2026
Customary and Civil marriages are equal, says Constitutional Court

Customary and Civil marriages are equal, says Constitutional Court

The Constitutional Court has recently delivered a significant judgment reaffirming that customary marriages and civil marriages hold equal legal status. Importantly, the Court clarified the implications and validity of antenuptial contracts within the context of customary marriages.

CSOS or Court? The choice is yours

CSOS or Court? The choice is yours

The recent judgment in Parch Properties 72 (Pty) Ltd v Summervale Lifestyle Estate Owner’s Association and Others 2026 (1) SA 449 (SCA) (17 October 2025) has brought welcome clarity to the long‑standing question of whether the Community Schemes Ombud Service Act 9 of 2011 (CSOS Act) limits the jurisdiction of the High Court.

Hurt feelings ≠ Constructive dismissal

Hurt feelings ≠ Constructive dismissal

Constructive dismissal was incorporated into South African labour law in the 1980s and later codified in the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (“LRA”). In terms of section 186(1)(e) of the LRA, an employee may resign, whether with or without notice, and claim unfair dismissal on the basis that their continued employment had become intolerable. Although the concept can be difficult to apply in practice, the Constitutional Court has clarified its meaning and reaffirmed its role within our law.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest