Deregistration looms for non-compliant companies

The recent ruling of Goosen v Minister of Trade and Industry and Others (EL 639/2024) [2024] ZAECELLC 28 highlights the critical duty companies have to file annual returns with the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC) and the significance of the procedures companies must follow to reinstate a deregistered company.

In the Goosen-case the legal proceedings centred around an urgent application by the applicant asking that Goosen Marketing CC be re-registered and reinstated by the CIPC so the close corporation can proceed with a separate trial. The CIPC is mandated to implement steps to deregister a company or close corporation due to non-compliance with annual filing requirements. As soon as an entity becomes deregistered, its assets and property are regarded as ‘bona vacantia’, meaning it shall vest in the State. The Court reiterated this point by referring to the judgment handed down in Rainbow Diamonds EDMS Bpk en Andere v Suid-Afrikaanse Nasionale Lewensassuransiemaatskappy 1984 (3) SA 1 (A)

In the Goosen-case the applicant had failed to cite any provisions of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 (“Companies Act”) in the proceedings for the reinstatement of the close corporation. The applicant argued that the proposed reinstatement request was straightforward, and he could merely communicate with the CIPC via email. The Court however confirmed the correct approach to be followed in that the application for reinstatement needed to be in line with the provisions of sections 82 and 83 of the Companies Act, read together with regulation 40 of the Companies Act Regulations and the Practice Note provided by the CIPC.  

The Court indicated that the Companies Act in section 82(4) expressly explores, and the CIPC promotes, the right to apply for the reinstatement of a company (or close corporation) despite its failure to provide annual returns. However, the provisions allude to an administrative procedure which requires submitting specific data and proof that the CIPC believes is necessary to its mandate.

Companies (including close corporations) are required by law, as provided for in section 33 of the Companies Act, to file annual returns with the CIPC. Taking account also of the recent General Laws (Anti-Money Laundering and Combating Terrorism Financing) Amendment Act 22 of 2022 and its subsequent effect on the Companies Act, companies are now in addition also required to provide additional items in their annual returns submitted to the CIPC, such as the entity’s annual financial statements, securities register, and disclosure of beneficial interest.

To summarise, submitting annual returns and fulfilling all other requirements mandated by the Companies Act is an indispensable legal requirement. To avoid having any entity deregistered and its property vesting in the State, submission of the annual returns and related items correctly on annual basis (including any holding companies that may not necessarily operate but hold shares in the company) is therefore vital. 

Disclaimer: This article is the personal opinion/view of the author(s) and is not necessarily that of the firm. The content is provided for information only and should not be seen as an exact or complete exposition of the law. Accordingly, no reliance should be placed on the content for any reason whatsoever and no action should be taken on the basis thereof unless its application and accuracy has been confirmed by a legal advisor. The firm and author(s) cannot be held liable for any prejudice or damage resulting from action taken on the basis of this content without further written confirmation by the author(s). 

 

July 24, 2024
Protecting creators in the digital era – Copyright amendments

Protecting creators in the digital era – Copyright amendments

Nearly 5 decades after its original enactment, South Africa’s copyright regime is undergoing one of the most significant reforms in its history. The Copyright Amendment Bill [B13F-2017] introduces modern protections to secure the financial and digital interests of authors and performers, thereby strengthening their economic rights in an increasingly digital world. While parts of the Bill remain under constitutional review, a landmark 2025 court ruling has already enforced critical protections for users with disabilities. This article breaks down the primary measures intended to safeguard South African creativity.

The importance of due diligence in M&A

The importance of due diligence in M&A

The excitement of a merger or acquisition often sits in the “big picture” strategy, but the success of the deal lives or dies in the details. Due diligence is not a box-ticking exercise. It is the point at which assumptions are tested, risks are priced, and uncomfortable questions are asked. This article explores why looking before you leap, by conducting a thorough due diligence, is the golden rule of mergers & acquisitions (“M&A”) transactions.

Customary marriages stand equal

Customary marriages stand equal

In a landmark judgment delivered on 21 January 2026, the Constitutional Court pronounced welcomed clarity on the interplay between customary marriages, civil marriages, and antenuptial contracts (“ANC”). The Court, by majority decision in VVC v JRM and Others (CCT202/24) [2026] ZACC 2 (21 January 2026) , declined to confirm a High Court order that had declared section 10(2) of the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998 (“the Recognition Act”) unconstitutional. The majority decision powerfully reaffirmed the equal constitutional status of customary marriages and established that spouses cannot unilaterally alter their matrimonial property regime without judicial oversight.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest