Contact
B-BBEE Act | BEE | Business

Who qualifies as a Black person under the BEE Act?

“I have a black woman that has been working for me for a number of years. She is an asset to my business and I have been planning to give her shares in my company. However, she’s from Zambia and is only a permanent resident of South Africa. Will she qualify as a black shareholder for purposes of BEE legislation if I make her a shareholder?”

To answer this, it is important to outline the objectives of the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act 53 of 2003 (“B-BBEE Act””). The B-BBEE Act was enacted to redress historical disparities suffered by specific races in South Africa. It aims to do this by increasing the participation of black South Africans in the economy and to afford them opportunities through increased employment and more equitable income distribution. 

Section 1 of the B-BBEE Act defines Black people as Africans, Coloureds and Indians- 

  1. who are citizens of the Republic of South Africa by birth or descent; or
  2. who became citizens of the Republic of South Africa by naturalisation –
    1. before 27 April 1994; or
    2. on or after 27 April 1994 and who would have been entitled to acquire citizenship by naturalisation prior to that date;

Additionally, our courts have also determined that Chinese persons will be included in the definition of Black people if they are citizens of South Africa by virtue of Section 1 above. This means that the B-BBEE Act qualifies Africans, Coloureds and Indians (including Chinese since 2008) who are citizens by birth, descent or naturalisation as Black persons for purposes of the B-BBEE Act and related legislation and regulations.

What this means is that the black woman working for your, being of Zambian descent and not a South Africa citizen, will not fall within the definition of a Black person for purposes of the B-BBEE Act and will not qualify as a Black person. Although nothing is stopping you from making her a shareholder in your company, you will not be able to receive any recognition for her as a Black shareholder. Any misrepresentation of her status, would also amount to an offence with the potential of a fine or imprisonment. 

December 14, 2021
Customary and Civil marriages are equal, says Constitutional Court

Customary and Civil marriages are equal, says Constitutional Court

by | Apr 28, 2026 | , , , ,

The Constitutional Court has recently delivered a significant judgment reaffirming that customary marriages and civil marriages hold equal legal status. Importantly, the Court clarified the implications and validity of antenuptial contracts within the context of customary marriages.

CSOS or Court? The choice is yours

CSOS or Court? The choice is yours

by | Apr 28, 2026 | , , ,

The recent judgment in Parch Properties 72 (Pty) Ltd v Summervale Lifestyle Estate Owner’s Association and Others 2026 (1) SA 449 (SCA) (17 October 2025) has brought welcome clarity to the long‑standing question of whether the Community Schemes Ombud Service Act 9 of 2011 (CSOS Act) limits the jurisdiction of the High Court.

Hurt feelings ≠ Constructive dismissal

Hurt feelings ≠ Constructive dismissal

by | Apr 22, 2026 | , ,

Constructive dismissal was incorporated into South African labour law in the 1980s and later codified in the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (“LRA”). In terms of section 186(1)(e) of the LRA, an employee may resign, whether with or without notice, and claim unfair dismissal on the basis that their continued employment had become intolerable. Although the concept can be difficult to apply in practice, the Constitutional Court has clarified its meaning and reaffirmed its role within our law.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest