Tinsel, trolleys, and traps: Outsmarting the Black Friday storm

As Black Friday specials and festive-season sales saturate the market, retailers compete with promises of “unbeatable” discounts and “blink-and-you-miss-it” deals. But even in the frenzy, the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 (the “CPA”) still applies. Designed to curb deceptive advertising, ensure fair pricing, and guarantee that goods remain of acceptable quality, the CPA sets the rules of the game. Understanding these rights is essential for both suppliers and shoppers, helping prevent year-end discounts from turning into disputes.

The first aspect to consider is advertising or marketing. In terms of section 41 of the CPA, suppliers are prohibited from engaging in false, misleading, or deceptive marketing practices. This means that consumers should be cautious of the following:

  • Suppliers suggesting that a consumer is getting a bigger discount than they are.
  • Adverts that promote products that are out of stock simply to lure customers in.
  • Use of vague “up to” savings without clarifying which items qualify.

All displayed goods must also have a clearly marked price, and retailers are required to honour that price. If a price as displayed contains an inadvertent and obvious error, the supplier is not bound by it after correcting the error in the displayed price, and taking reasonable steps in the circumstances to inform consumers to whom the erroneous price may have been displayed of the error and the correct price. If a store refuses to honour its advertised price, consumers have every right to raise this issue with the supplier directly. Should the issue remain unresolved, the consumer can utilise the remedies provided for in the CPA, which allows the consumer to approach an industry ombud or the National Consumer Commission (“NCC”).

We often come across signs or policies that say, “No Returns on Sale Items” or “No exchanges or refunds on sale items”. However, this does not waive a consumer’s rights in terms of the CPA. Consumers do not have an automatic right to return goods simply because they have changed their minds, unless the retailer’s own policy allows it. However, the CPA grants specific rights to return goods in certain cases, for example, when goods are defective, unsafe, or not of good quality within six months of purchase; when goods are bought because of direct marketing (subject to a five-business-day cooling-off period); or when unsolicited goods are delivered. For failed, unsafe or defective goods, consumers are entitled to a repair, replacement, or refund at the supplier’s cost.

If a consumer believes that they have been misled, they should report misleading marketing to the relevant entity to enforce their rights  . Black Friday and festive promotions offer businesses and consumers great opportunities, but they may also push the boundaries of ethical business practices and legal compliance.  Before you grab that bargain, read the fine print. Your rights matter.

Disclaimer: This article is the personal opinion/view of the author(s) and does not necessarily present the views of the firm. The content is provided for information only and should not be seen as an exact or complete exposition of the law. Accordingly, no reliance should be placed on the content for any reason whatsoever, and no action should be taken on the basis thereof unless its application and accuracy have been confirmed by a legal advisor. The firm and author(s) cannot be held liable for any prejudice or damage resulting from action taken based on this content without further written confirmation by the author(s). 

November 24, 2025
Section 8C explained: Tax tips for employee share schemes

Section 8C explained: Tax tips for employee share schemes

Employee share schemes are often introduced to reward, retain, or align employees with long-term business growth. However, under section 8C of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 (the “Income Tax Act”), these arrangements can create significant and unexpected tax liabilities for employees when equity instruments vest. This article explains how section 8C operates, what qualifies as an “equity instrument,” and why careful structuring of share schemes is essential to avoid punitive tax outcomes.

The costly consequences of backdated share transactions

The costly consequences of backdated share transactions

The South African legislative framework regards backdated shares as a suspicious and illegal practice, as it arises when a share issue or transfer is recorded as having occurred on an earlier date than the actual transaction. While backdating may be viewed as an administrative oversight, the consequences may constitute compliance risk, serious misconduct on directors, beneficial owners and compliance officers who authorise the backdating of share transactions. This is because backdated shares may manipulate the timing of funds, obscure the source of funds, and distort a company’s beneficial ownership structure.

Tax transparency matters: Are your deals reportable?

Tax transparency matters: Are your deals reportable?

Some deals come with hidden reporting duties. Find out when your transactions could trigger SARS disclosure rules, and how to stay compliant. You may have heard the term “reportable arrangement” in tax conversations around commercial transactions. It sounds technical, and it is, but at its core, it’s about transparency. The South African Revenue Service (“SARS”) seeks information on certain transactions that could be used to avoid or reduce tax. If you enter a reportable arrangement, you may be legally required to report it. Failure to comply can result in significant penalties.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest