Consumer complaints can no longer be ignored

I recently bought ready-mix cement at a chain hardware store. I followed the instructions carefully in mixing the cement, but when I started pouring it the consistency was clearly not right and it would not set. I went back to the hardware store to complain that the cement quality was unsatisfactory, but the store clerk said he couldn’t help me and that I must write a letter to the store with my complaint and attach photos, which I then did but have still not heard from them. Surely they are required to respond to a written complaint and cannot just ignore me?

In short, you are correct and the store cannot just ignore you. Your frustration is such a common encounter that the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 (“CPA”) was promulgated to help protect consumers. Recently, this protection was further expanded by the Consumer Goods and Services Industry Code of Conduct (“Code of Conduct”) published in terms of the CPA which Code of Conduct now also established the Consumer Goods and Services Ombud (“Ombud”).

The Code of Conduct applies to just about all consumer transactions regulated by the CPA (which is just about most commercial transactions a consumer will undertake with a business) and to all suppliers selling goods or services to consumers. The Code of Conduct does however exclude transactions that are governed by other specific public regulations such as the automotive industry, electronic communication services and transactions with organs of state or financial institutions.

The Code of Conduct serves to inform consumers of the various consumer rights available to them and is aimed at helping reduce the disadvantage often experienced by consumers when trying to enforce their rights against a business, as well as protect consumers from unfair trade practices.

The Ombud has also been established to provide a dispute resolution mechanism for disputes arising from consumer transactions. The Ombud can be approached free of charge to help address a dispute laid by a consumer. The Ombud is also responsible to help create awareness of consumer rights and the responsibilities of suppliers to act in accordance with the CPA and Code of Conduct. 

In terms of the Code of Conduct all suppliers are also required to establish internal complaints-handling procedures for dealing with customer complaints. The adherence to the Code of Conduct must be displayed prominently at the place of business as well as on its website and a copy of the Code of Conduct (or summary thereof) and the supplier’s internal complaints-handling process must be made available to any consumer upon request, or the consumer must be directed to where to obtain a copy of the Code of Conduct and/or the internal complaints-handling process. The contact details of the Ombud should also be displayed for consumers who wish to make use of its dispute resolution procedures where the supplier’s complaints procedures did not satisfactorily address the consumer’s complaint. The complaints procedures and process for managing consumer complaints must also be well-communicated to staff of the supplier and staff must be trained in effectively dealing with complaints and/or consumer disputes. 

The Code of Conduct and the Ombud will go a long way in assisting consumers like yourself to be aware of the process for lodging a compliant and having a complaint dealt with effectively – and so avoid the frustration of a business that does not wish to try and address a customer’s complaint or tries to make you jump through hoops before they will listen to you. 

July 16, 2015
Customary and Civil marriages are equal, says Constitutional Court

Customary and Civil marriages are equal, says Constitutional Court

The Constitutional Court has recently delivered a significant judgment reaffirming that customary marriages and civil marriages hold equal legal status. Importantly, the Court clarified the implications and validity of antenuptial contracts within the context of customary marriages.

CSOS or Court? The choice is yours

CSOS or Court? The choice is yours

The recent judgment in Parch Properties 72 (Pty) Ltd v Summervale Lifestyle Estate Owner’s Association and Others 2026 (1) SA 449 (SCA) (17 October 2025) has brought welcome clarity to the long‑standing question of whether the Community Schemes Ombud Service Act 9 of 2011 (CSOS Act) limits the jurisdiction of the High Court.

Hurt feelings ≠ Constructive dismissal

Hurt feelings ≠ Constructive dismissal

Constructive dismissal was incorporated into South African labour law in the 1980s and later codified in the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (“LRA”). In terms of section 186(1)(e) of the LRA, an employee may resign, whether with or without notice, and claim unfair dismissal on the basis that their continued employment had become intolerable. Although the concept can be difficult to apply in practice, the Constitutional Court has clarified its meaning and reaffirmed its role within our law.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest