Appeal Court settles debate on when you can claim arrear maintenance

A friend of yours has been divorced for a few years now. Her ex was supposed to pay maintenance, but it wasn’t long before he started paying less and less and then eventually stopped. Your friend was just too fearful of conflict to do anything about it and continued to raise her kids by herself. Now however, money is tight and she is wondering if there is anything she can do to get her ex to pay the maintenance he should have paid?

The above scenario is unfortunately quite common where exes don’t meet their responsibilities and pay maintenance. Yet, where does this leave the other spouse? Can they recover arrear maintenance or is there no remedy if the left this too long? Our Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) has hopefully now finally established the position in law.

In an appeal from the Western Cape Division of the High Court our SCA had to consider the following situation. An ex-husband had to pay maintenance for two minor children as well as his ex-wife in terms of their divorce settlement, which was made an order of the court. The husband defaulted on the obligation to pay and the ex-wife later had a writ of execution issued in respect of the arrear maintenance. The ex-husband contended that the maintenance order was not judgement debt which prescribed after 30 years as per the Prescription Act, but was an ordinary debt which prescribes after three years in terms of the Prescription Act.

The Western Cape Division of the High Court held that the maintenance obligations in the settlement arose from a judgment debt as contemplated in the Prescription Act, and that the maintenance obligations incorporated in the order was subject to 30 years before prescribing.

Our SCA, in reviewing the decision and position in law, concurred with the decision of the High Court and upheld the finding that maintenance orders that were made an order of court only expired after 30 years. This means that a party can at any time before the expiry of the 30 years approach a court to claim arrear maintenance from a party not fulfilling his or her maintenance obligations.

The SCA decision is strong confirmation of the importance of parties having to honour their agreed maintenance obligations and that a party cannot hide behind the effluxion of time to excuse their failure to pay maintenance.

Should you or someone you know be in the position where an ex is not paying his/her maintenance get in touch with us or contact your attorney to assist you with taking action to recover any arrear maintenance.

Disclaimer: This article is the personal opinion/view of the author(s) and is not necessarily that of the firm. The content is provided for information only and should not be seen as an exact or complete exposition of the law. Accordingly, no reliance should be placed on the content for any reason whatsoever and no action should be taken on the basis thereof unless its application and accuracy has been confirmed by a legal advisor. The firm and author(s) cannot be held liable for any prejudice or damage resulting from action taken on the basis of this content without further written confirmation by the author(s).

April 13, 2022
Slip and trip: who is liable?

Slip and trip: who is liable?

With a growing number of ‘slip and trip’ cases being referred to our courts, property owners must understand what they need to do to avoid liability for injuries sustained on their property. In this article, we examine the recent case of Ngwenya vs Accelerate Property Fund (2022/13159) [2024] ZAGPJHC 880 to explore the latest rulings regarding property owner liability.

Developers caught off guard with sectional title costs

Developers caught off guard with sectional title costs

In the recent case of Club Kerkira (Pty) Limited v Trustees of Club Kerkira Body Corporate and Others (D11451/2021) [2024] ZAKZDHC 40, the KZN High Court had to clarify the position as to whether the holder of a real right of extension (in this case the developer) had a responsibility to contribute towards the maintenance costs of the sectional title scheme.

See no evil, speak no evil: reporting misconduct

See no evil, speak no evil: reporting misconduct

Enforcing workplace rules frequently relies on employees reporting misconduct that they have witnessed by fellow employees to their employer. This is vital for maintaining workplace discipline and ensuring that employees adhere to the employer’s rules. But what is the worst that can happen to an employee who elects to protect a fellow employee by keeping quiet about their transgressions?

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest