Alcohol (mis)use at work functions

“At our recent work function for company staff at a private outside venue, a few of the staff members had too much to drink and became loud, inappropriate and even offensive, to the point where a number of the other staff members left the function early. Afterwards a number of staff complained to me about the conduct of these staff members. How do I manage this and avoid similar situations arising at the next function?”

It is unfortunate when a work event intended to foster positive staff relations goes wrong because of the misuse of alcohol reducing inhibitions and allowing negative or inappropriate conduct to surface, ruining the experience for everyone involved. Such behaviour, if allowed to continue unchecked, can also negatively influence the culture of a company and make it increasingly difficult to curb it being seen as ‘acceptable’ conduct at work functions. 

It is important to note that the attendance of any official work function of a company is an employee privilege within the employment relationship with the employer. This means that such a function falls within the course and scope of employment and all the rules of the employer also apply to such a function. Accordingly, even though the specific conduct of employees at such a function may not be spelt out in the rules of the employer, employees are required by reason of the employee-employer relationship to be respectful to their employer and colleagues, including withholding themselves from conduct which undermines this employment relationship and which prejudices the employer.

The fact that the function may have been held outside the company office or formal working hours is irrelevant as this obligation on employees extends beyond the workplace and normal working hours. This means that an employer is well within their rights to take disciplinary steps against employees that have breached this obligation, thereby making it clear that such conduct is unacceptable.

What should also be noted is as such a function falls within the course and scope of employment, it also includes a duty on the employer to ensure that reasonable steps are taken to protect employees, failing which the employer could be held liable for a breach of this duty. This means that if steps were not taken by the employer to stop offensive, harassing, victimising or intimidating conduct at a function, the employer could be liable to an employee that was a victim of such untoward conduct at the work function and now seeks legal redress.

Accordingly, it is important that employers are clear regarding their views on required conduct at work functions and clamp down on transgressors to avoid a systemic culture of inappropriate conduct developing at the company. A useful step is to update the firm rules with clear guidelines on acceptable conduct at work social functions and then to remind staff of such rules and each individual’s responsibility to monitor their consumption of alcohol and conduct, including making transport arrangements if necessary. 

It may be useful to obtain the assistance of a labour practitioner to investigate possible disciplinary measures against your employees and to help with a review of your current workplace rules to incorporate clear rules regarding employee conduct at social work events.

February 9, 2016
Customary and Civil marriages are equal, says Constitutional Court

Customary and Civil marriages are equal, says Constitutional Court

The Constitutional Court has recently delivered a significant judgment reaffirming that customary marriages and civil marriages hold equal legal status. Importantly, the Court clarified the implications and validity of antenuptial contracts within the context of customary marriages.

CSOS or Court? The choice is yours

CSOS or Court? The choice is yours

The recent judgment in Parch Properties 72 (Pty) Ltd v Summervale Lifestyle Estate Owner’s Association and Others 2026 (1) SA 449 (SCA) (17 October 2025) has brought welcome clarity to the long‑standing question of whether the Community Schemes Ombud Service Act 9 of 2011 (CSOS Act) limits the jurisdiction of the High Court.

Hurt feelings ≠ Constructive dismissal

Hurt feelings ≠ Constructive dismissal

Constructive dismissal was incorporated into South African labour law in the 1980s and later codified in the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (“LRA”). In terms of section 186(1)(e) of the LRA, an employee may resign, whether with or without notice, and claim unfair dismissal on the basis that their continued employment had become intolerable. Although the concept can be difficult to apply in practice, the Constitutional Court has clarified its meaning and reaffirmed its role within our law.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest