Must a psychometric test be certified?

“I have been investigating the use of psychometric tests at my business to better screen potential job applicants. A friend however informed me that I should be careful and make sure that whatever test I use is certified by the Health Professions Council. Is this so, because I’m struggling to find tests that are so certified?”

Psychometric tests are generally used to measure personality traits or personal characteristics about a person including aspects such as styles or modes of working, ability to think conceptually, decision-making styles and stress levels. In the employment context, psychometric tests have frequently been used to help provide additional information about persons for purposes of employment, promotions, personal development etc. 

In South Africa, Section 8 of the Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998 (“EEA”) sets out the requirements for psychological testing, which include psychometric tests. Section 8 states that:

“Psychological testing and other similar assessments of an employee are prohibited unless the test or assessment being used-

(a)  has been scientifically shown to be valid and reliable; 
(b)  can be applied fairly to all employees; 
(c)  is not biased against any employee or group; and 
(d)  has been certified by the Health Professions Council of South Africa established by section 2 of the Health Professions Act, 1974 (Act 56 of 1974), or any other body which may be authorised by law to certify those tests or assessments.”  
   

In the recent decision of Association of Test Publishers of South Africa v President of the Republic of South Africa, the proclamation that added the additional requirement that psychometric tests be certified by the Health Professions Council of South Africa was determined to be null and void and of no force and effect. Accordingly, Section 8(d) is no longer a requirement for the valid use of a psychometric test. The other requirements in Section 8 however still apply and would need to be met for the psychometric test to be validly used.

Before finalising a decision to use a specific psychometric test, discuss the requirements of Section 8(a)-(c) with the provider of the test to establish whether the test meets these criteria and consult with a labour specialist to help guide you on how to correctly implement the use of such tests within your business. Remember that the criteria listed in section 8 are cumulative and the onus would lie with you as employer to prove that any test used meets these criteria.

March 8, 2022
Checkmate for Pawn Agreements: How the Recent SCA Judgment Protects Consumers from Pawnbroker Profits

Checkmate for Pawn Agreements: How the Recent SCA Judgment Protects Consumers from Pawnbroker Profits

In a landmark judgment delivered on 9 April 2025, where VDT Attorneys acted on behalf of the National Credit Regulator, the South African Supreme Court of Appeal (the “SCA”) brought clarity to the rights and obligations of consumers and pawnbrokers when dealing with pawned goods. In the case of The Loan Company (Pty) Ltd v National Credit Regulator and Another (1104/2023) [2025] ZASCA 40, the SCA confirmed a critical principle, i.e. if a pawned asset is sold for more than the outstanding loan and lawful charges, the surplus must be refunded to the consumer. Pawnbrokers cannot lawfully keep the full sale proceeds. This ruling marks a major victory for consumer protection, reinforcing South Africa’s commitment to fairness in credit transactions.

Heritage Day: Reflections from a New Breed law firm

Heritage Day: Reflections from a New Breed law firm

On 24 September, we pause to take time off to commemorate Heritage Day, a day enshrined in both our public calendar and the Constitution. A constitutional affirmation of who we are, where we come from, and where we are headed as a nation. As a new breed law firm, we reflect on how the practice of law is intertwined with the heritage of the very people it serves.

Treasury halts controversial tax proposal on preference shares

Treasury halts controversial tax proposal on preference shares

Due to the potential adverse investment impact and stakeholder concerns on the proposed amendment to the definition of “hybrid equity instrument” in the 2025 draft Taxation Laws Amendment Bill (“Bill”), the proposed amendment has been retracted. On 03 September, the National Treasury issued a media statement retracting the proposal to redefine hybrid equity instruments, which has been a relief to all stakeholders.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest