How to quieten that barking dog?

“My neighbour’s two dogs have been barking incessantly the last few days at all hours of the day and night. My wife, our toddler and I have not been able to sleep and its taking its toll on us personally and at work. Is there anything that we can do legally?”

In terms of our law, all property owners have the right to the undisturbed use and enjoyment of their land and property, subject to compliance with certain legislation, regulations and municipal by-laws, which use should be exercised in a manner that does not prejudice or burden anyone else, or infringe on the right of enjoyment of their property. 

The incessant barking of your neighbour’s dogs might constitute a noise nuisance, as it has the potential to impair or disturb your peace and convenience. To prove that a noise nuisance does exist, a reasonable person without any peculiar sensitivity to the particular noise, must find it, if not quite intolerable, a serious impediment to the ordinary and reasonable enjoyment of his property.

The Noise Control Regulations issued under the Environment Conservation Act, prohibits noise nuisance and determines that no person shall allow an animal owned or controlled by him to cause a noise nuisance. Persons who contravene or fail to comply with the provisions of these regulations, can face penalties of, fines or imprisonment.

To solve your problem, my first suggestion is to try and solve the problem amicably by approaching your neighbour to inform him about the nuisance being caused by their barking dogs and if possible, offer a solution for the problem. Should this amicable approach fail, a more formal attorney’s letter can also be used warning of further legal steps to be taken should your neighbour fail to address the nuisance.

If this still does not work, the following legal action should then be considered:

· Report the noise nuisance by making a written complaint or statement to your local municipality whose officials are empowered to take the necessary steps to resolve the problem. Steps they can take include instructions or warnings to reduce the noise or they can cause the animal to be impounded if the owner fails to comply with their instructions. 
· If the problem still persists, an application can be made to court for an interdict preventing your neighbour from further causing or allowing such noise. However, one should tread carefully not to institute frivolous applications.

The law provides remedies to combat noise nuisances, provided the relief sought is reasonable and the problem is persistent. First try to address the problem amicably with your neighbours and then contact your attorney to assist you with further steps should such be needed.

November 9, 2016
Protecting creators in the digital era – Copyright amendments

Protecting creators in the digital era – Copyright amendments

Nearly 5 decades after its original enactment, South Africa’s copyright regime is undergoing one of the most significant reforms in its history. The Copyright Amendment Bill [B13F-2017] introduces modern protections to secure the financial and digital interests of authors and performers, thereby strengthening their economic rights in an increasingly digital world. While parts of the Bill remain under constitutional review, a landmark 2025 court ruling has already enforced critical protections for users with disabilities. This article breaks down the primary measures intended to safeguard South African creativity.

The importance of due diligence in M&A

The importance of due diligence in M&A

The excitement of a merger or acquisition often sits in the “big picture” strategy, but the success of the deal lives or dies in the details. Due diligence is not a box-ticking exercise. It is the point at which assumptions are tested, risks are priced, and uncomfortable questions are asked. This article explores why looking before you leap, by conducting a thorough due diligence, is the golden rule of mergers & acquisitions (“M&A”) transactions.

Customary marriages stand equal

Customary marriages stand equal

In a landmark judgment delivered on 21 January 2026, the Constitutional Court pronounced welcomed clarity on the interplay between customary marriages, civil marriages, and antenuptial contracts (“ANC”). The Court, by majority decision in VVC v JRM and Others (CCT202/24) [2026] ZACC 2 (21 January 2026) , declined to confirm a High Court order that had declared section 10(2) of the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998 (“the Recognition Act”) unconstitutional. The majority decision powerfully reaffirmed the equal constitutional status of customary marriages and established that spouses cannot unilaterally alter their matrimonial property regime without judicial oversight.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest