Using a 72 hour clause in property purchase agreements

Sellers strive to obtain the highest price in the shortest period. In practice, property is often sold subject to a suspensive condition, the most common being that that the sale will be null and void if (for example) a loan is not obtained from a bank within fourteen days.

Sellers strive to obtain the highest price in the shortest period.  In practice, property is often sold subject to a suspensive condition, the most common being that that the sale will be null and void if (for example) a loan is not obtained from a bank within fourteen days. 

What happens however if cash or a bank approved buyer(s) appear on the horizon during the fourteen days?  A prospective cash buyer is effectively disqualified to purchase, due to the operation of the suspensive clause.  The seller runs the risk that the cash buyer may identify a suitable substitute property, whilst bond approval may not be obtained, leaving the seller high and dry in the end. 

One solution is incorporating a 72-hour clause to help mitigate the risk of losing prospective unconditional buyer(s).

The following is an example of a typical 72-hour clause:

“This offer is further subject to:

1. If the Seller receives at any time a bona fide unconditional offer to purchase, from a third party, then the Seller is entitled to give the Purchaser 72-hours (i.e. 3 full working days) written notice to comply with all the suspensive conditions contained in this offer to purchase within the aforementioned time.

2. If the Purchaser cannot comply with the abovementioned paragraph 1, then this offer to purchase is deemed cancelled.”

The 72-hour clause serves to mitigate the risk of losing prospective buyer(s).  The seller is entitled to call upon the purchaser to comply within 72-hours with all the suspensive conditions, if and when, a bona fide unconditional offer to purchase is received from a third party.  The seller maintains a bargaining position and the seller can guarantee an unconditional buyer that he will know within 72-hours if his unconditional offer is accepted or not.  The risk of losing an unconditional buyer is thus reduced.

Importantly though, the seller cannot demand of the purchaser to pay a higher purchase price, if the unconditional offer encompasses a higher purchase price. 

In summary: Property can be sold subject to suspensive conditions. Prospective buyers are effectively disqualified to purchase, whilst, the suspensive conditions are operational.  A 72-hour clause can however serve to mitigate the risk of losing prospective buyer(s).

February 6, 2012
Customary and Civil marriages are equal, says Constitutional Court

Customary and Civil marriages are equal, says Constitutional Court

The Constitutional Court has recently delivered a significant judgment reaffirming that customary marriages and civil marriages hold equal legal status. Importantly, the Court clarified the implications and validity of antenuptial contracts within the context of customary marriages.

CSOS or Court? The choice is yours

CSOS or Court? The choice is yours

The recent judgment in Parch Properties 72 (Pty) Ltd v Summervale Lifestyle Estate Owner’s Association and Others 2026 (1) SA 449 (SCA) (17 October 2025) has brought welcome clarity to the long‑standing question of whether the Community Schemes Ombud Service Act 9 of 2011 (CSOS Act) limits the jurisdiction of the High Court.

Hurt feelings ≠ Constructive dismissal

Hurt feelings ≠ Constructive dismissal

Constructive dismissal was incorporated into South African labour law in the 1980s and later codified in the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (“LRA”). In terms of section 186(1)(e) of the LRA, an employee may resign, whether with or without notice, and claim unfair dismissal on the basis that their continued employment had become intolerable. Although the concept can be difficult to apply in practice, the Constitutional Court has clarified its meaning and reaffirmed its role within our law.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest