Government and POPIA – applicable or not?

“With all the talk of POPIA coming into effect and businesses having to get ready to comply, I was wondering whether government and municipalities also need to comply with POPIA. Surely, government entities have a lot of personal information in their possession that they must protect.”

The Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 (“POPIA”) has been enacted to give effect to the constitutional right to privacy as enshrined in section 14 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996. POPIA does this by putting measures in place to safeguard personal information when such is processed by a public or private body or any other person which alone or in conjunction with others determines the purpose of and means for processing personal information. Any such body processing personal information is referred to as a ‘responsible party’.

To answer your question. Yes, government must comply with POPIA. POPIA determines that a public body is also deemed to be a responsible party for purposes of POPIA. A public body is any department of state or administration in the national, or provincial sphere of government or any municipality in the local sphere of government, or any functionary or institution when exercising a power of performing a duty in terms of the Constitution or provincial constitution, or exercising a public power or performing a public function in terms of any legislation.

POPIA therefore applies equally to a public or private entity when it comes to the processing of personal information. That said, POPIA does create certain exceptions, and excludes public bodies from the application of POPIA where these bodies process personal information that involves national security, including activities that are aimed at assisting in the identification of the financing of terrorist and related activities, defence or public safety, or the purpose of the information is the prevention, detection, including assistance in the identification of the proceeds of unlawful activities and the combating of money laundering activities, investigation or proof of offences, the prosecution of offenders or the execution of sentences or security measures to the extent that adequate safeguards have been established in legislation for the protection of such personal information. 

However, unless exempted, government will need to comply with POPIA in the same way as any other responsible party.

June 14, 2021
Customary and Civil marriages are equal, says Constitutional Court

Customary and Civil marriages are equal, says Constitutional Court

The Constitutional Court has recently delivered a significant judgment reaffirming that customary marriages and civil marriages hold equal legal status. Importantly, the Court clarified the implications and validity of antenuptial contracts within the context of customary marriages.

CSOS or Court? The choice is yours

CSOS or Court? The choice is yours

The recent judgment in Parch Properties 72 (Pty) Ltd v Summervale Lifestyle Estate Owner’s Association and Others 2026 (1) SA 449 (SCA) (17 October 2025) has brought welcome clarity to the long‑standing question of whether the Community Schemes Ombud Service Act 9 of 2011 (CSOS Act) limits the jurisdiction of the High Court.

Hurt feelings ≠ Constructive dismissal

Hurt feelings ≠ Constructive dismissal

Constructive dismissal was incorporated into South African labour law in the 1980s and later codified in the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (“LRA”). In terms of section 186(1)(e) of the LRA, an employee may resign, whether with or without notice, and claim unfair dismissal on the basis that their continued employment had become intolerable. Although the concept can be difficult to apply in practice, the Constitutional Court has clarified its meaning and reaffirmed its role within our law.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest