Contact
Beneficial Ownership | Trust | Wills and Trusts

Beneficial Ownership reporting: dormant and deregistered trusts

The General Laws (Anti-Money Laundering and Combating Terrorism Financing) Amendment Act 22 of 2022 introduced important changes to the Trust Property Control Act 57 of 1988, most notably the requirement for trusts to report on their beneficial ownership to the Master of the High Court. But what if the trust is dormant or has been deregistered? Is reporting still needed?

Following these amendments to the Trust Property Control Act, the Master of the High Court published a directive on 17 October 2023, introducing a new platform for the submission of beneficial ownership (BO) registers by trustees. The consequence for non-compliance with the BO reporting includes a fine of up to R10 million and/or a period of imprisonment not exceeding five years.

For purposes of a trust, a ‘beneficial owner’ inter alia includes –

  • a natural person who directly or indirectly ultimately owns the trust property.
  • a natural person who exercises effective control over the administration of the trust pursuant to the provisions of the trust deed.
  • the trust founder.
  • each trustee of the trust; and each beneficiary of the trust.

In terms of the amended section 11(A)(1) of the Trust Property Control Act, trustees are required to –

  • establish and record the BO of a trust.
  • maintain a record of the prescribed information pertaining to the BO of the trust.
  • submit the BO register to the Master on the electronic platform provided by the Master, and ensure that the BO information remains updated.

All BO information lodged on the electronic platform established by the Master will be available to various enforcement agencies, including, among others, the South African Revenue Service and the Financial Intelligence Centre.

However, such BO reporting is only applicable to registered trusts. Accordingly, dormant and/or deregistered trusts are exempted from providing BO information to the Master. Importantly, such dormant or deregistered trusts are required to send an electronic mail to the Master together with the respective declaration form (obtained from the Master) confirming that the trust is either dormant or deregistered, together with a copy of the identity document of the trustee making the declaration, as well as all relevant supporting documentation. 

Should a trust cease to be dormant, the trustees will be required to comply with the Beneficial Ownership reporting requirements applicable to an active registered trust.

Disclaimer: This article is the personal opinion/view of the author(s) and is not necessarily that of the firm. The content is provided for information only and should not be seen as an exact or complete exposition of the law. Accordingly, no reliance should be placed on the content for any reason whatsoever and no action should be taken on the basis thereof unless its application and accuracy has been confirmed by a legal advisor. The firm and author(s) cannot be held liable for any prejudice or damage resulting from action taken on the basis of this content without further written confirmation by the author(s). 

February 6, 2025
Customary and Civil marriages are equal, says Constitutional Court

Customary and Civil marriages are equal, says Constitutional Court

by | Apr 28, 2026 | , , , ,

The Constitutional Court has recently delivered a significant judgment reaffirming that customary marriages and civil marriages hold equal legal status. Importantly, the Court clarified the implications and validity of antenuptial contracts within the context of customary marriages.

CSOS or Court? The choice is yours

CSOS or Court? The choice is yours

by | Apr 28, 2026 | , , ,

The recent judgment in Parch Properties 72 (Pty) Ltd v Summervale Lifestyle Estate Owner’s Association and Others 2026 (1) SA 449 (SCA) (17 October 2025) has brought welcome clarity to the long‑standing question of whether the Community Schemes Ombud Service Act 9 of 2011 (CSOS Act) limits the jurisdiction of the High Court.

Hurt feelings ≠ Constructive dismissal

Hurt feelings ≠ Constructive dismissal

by | Apr 22, 2026 | , ,

Constructive dismissal was incorporated into South African labour law in the 1980s and later codified in the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (“LRA”). In terms of section 186(1)(e) of the LRA, an employee may resign, whether with or without notice, and claim unfair dismissal on the basis that their continued employment had become intolerable. Although the concept can be difficult to apply in practice, the Constitutional Court has clarified its meaning and reaffirmed its role within our law.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest