What do I need to keep in mind when appointing an executor in my will?

“I’m getting married soon and know that we are going to have to get a will in place. My friend told me that an important decision is deciding on who the executor of our estate will be. I have no idea though how to decide or what to consider. Can you help?”

Your friend is correct to say that the nomination of your executor is an important aspect of your will. Your executor is nominated in your will and upon your death, he or she will administer and distribute your estate in accordance with your testamentary wishes. Importantly, although you nominate your executor, the executor is only appointed by the Master of the High Court through the issuing of Letters of Executorship after your death.

Your executor will be responsible for, amongst other things:

Interpreting your will
Locating all the beneficiaries
Compiling a list of documents and information required by the Master of the High Court
Collecting information on all the assets and liabilities of the deceased
Calculating and paying estate duty
Allocating inheritances to beneficiaries in accordance with the will

Although it has become a regular practice to appoint a family member as executor, it should be kept in mind that, not only is executorship an onerous and complex task, but in terms of the regulations published by the Minister of Justice, only certain persons may administer estates for remuneration, for example practising accountants, practising attorneys and registered trust companies. 

Another alternative is to have family members nominated as co-executors together with an independent executor. However, this can create complexity which may hamper the speedy administration of your estate.

It should be noted that the Master may in some cases refuse to appoint a nominated executor, or only grant executorship if the executor is assisted by a fiduciary professional or provides security by way of an insurance policy.

It is also important to keep in mind that, should a family member be nominated, this family member will have to make decisions about the administration of the estate during an emotionally difficult time. More often than not, such a decision may be made solely based on fees, without considering whether the appointed agent has the knowledge, skill and testator’s best wishes at heart.

Our advice is to talk to your attorney or consult a fiduciary expert before making the decision of whom to appoint as executor and let them assist you in drafting your will correctly and deciding on whom to nominate as your executor.

November 9, 2018
Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Dress codes are a familiar part of many workplaces, yet employers often fail to calibrate how far they are allowed to go in regulating employee personal appearance. While employers may enforce standards of neatness, safety and professionalism, these rules cannot override constitutional rights, nor can they operate in a discriminatory manner. A recent reminder of this emerged from the Supreme Court of Appeal, where the court had to consider the fairness of dismissing correctional officers for refusing to cut their dreadlocks, contrary to the employer’s dress code.

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

The Competition Commission of South Africa (“Competition Commission”) identified a need to guide merger parties and stakeholders on claiming confidentiality over information. In September 2025, the Competition Commission issued Guidelines on the Commission’s handling of confidential information (“Guidelines”), which, however, are not binding on the Competition Commission, the Competition Tribunal or the Competition Appeal Court, but must be taken into account by these authorities when interpreting and applying the Competition Act 89 of 1998 (“Competition Act”).

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

In a recent Western Cape court case where the court ordered the termination of joint ownership of properties, an interesting question arose as to whether the termination of joint ownership did not amount to an eviction contrary to the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act, 19 of 1998 (PIE Act)? We look at the requirements for the termination of joint ownership by our courts and whether this can infringe on the PIE Act.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest