Can you avoid bond cancellation costs?

When your property is in the market and you cancel your bond, is there any way to avoid the bank’s cancellation fee?

When you cancel your mortgage bond, most banks will contractually charge you a cancellation fee. Such fees can be for early termination of the bond or for giving less than 90 days notice of your intention to cancel.

Unless your mortgage agreement is silent on the matter, generally the only way to avoid or reduce the bank’s cancellation penalty, is to meet the requirements of the bank, namely to give the required number of days notice. If you don’t provide the required notice of your intention to cancel your bond, banks can charge an early termination penalty that is equal to the interest that would have been payable under your mortgage agreement, for a period equal to the difference between three months and the settlement notice the consumer has provided (if any). 

Whether you want to cancel your bond because it has been settled, or because your property is being sold, there is unfortunately no way around paying bond cancellation costs. Financial institutions usually instruct an attorney to cancel such a bond on their behalf, the costs of which must be paid to the attorney. 

In terms of this “90 day rule”, the clock starts counting as soon as the institution receives written notice that you intend to cancel your bond. Yet should your bond cancellation register only after 90 days have passed, you will not have to pay an early termination penalty. 

There are some exceptions to this general rule where an early termination penalty will not apply, namely in the event of sequestration or in the case of a deceased estate.  

Should the bond be cancelled within 90 days, the bank will charge a pro-rata share of the penalty on the remaining number of days. As the contracts of banks differ however, it may be worthwhile to have your attorney or property professional have a look at your mortgage agreement with the bank to see what requirements have been set regarding avoiding a bond cancellation penalty.

January 8, 2022
Customary and Civil marriages are equal, says Constitutional Court

Customary and Civil marriages are equal, says Constitutional Court

The Constitutional Court has recently delivered a significant judgment reaffirming that customary marriages and civil marriages hold equal legal status. Importantly, the Court clarified the implications and validity of antenuptial contracts within the context of customary marriages.

CSOS or Court? The choice is yours

CSOS or Court? The choice is yours

The recent judgment in Parch Properties 72 (Pty) Ltd v Summervale Lifestyle Estate Owner’s Association and Others 2026 (1) SA 449 (SCA) (17 October 2025) has brought welcome clarity to the long‑standing question of whether the Community Schemes Ombud Service Act 9 of 2011 (CSOS Act) limits the jurisdiction of the High Court.

Hurt feelings ≠ Constructive dismissal

Hurt feelings ≠ Constructive dismissal

Constructive dismissal was incorporated into South African labour law in the 1980s and later codified in the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (“LRA”). In terms of section 186(1)(e) of the LRA, an employee may resign, whether with or without notice, and claim unfair dismissal on the basis that their continued employment had become intolerable. Although the concept can be difficult to apply in practice, the Constitutional Court has clarified its meaning and reaffirmed its role within our law.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest